It's not absolutely perfect but it's pretty close. Any more questions please feel free to ask.
It's not, btw, a "formatting problem" per se...it's that the view-reply or reply-mode pages (same thing) use different markup than view-recent in your particular style. On top of that, the view-reply/reply mode pages don't have body class markup to allow you to target their different and/or missing classes directly. This is quite a common issue with LJ and DW styles. :)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
onlyembers
Yeah, try this:
Date: 2010-10-24 06:25 pm (UTC).date, .replytoposter {color:#bbb; border-bottom:1px dashed #ccc; padding-top: 2px; padding-bottom: 2px; font-size:9px; text-transform:uppercase;margin-top: -20px;}
.subject,.replytosubject {display:block; position: static; color:#db5c83; padding: 6px 0px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; font-size:18px; line-height:15px; letter-spacing: 2px; font-weight:normal;}
.subject a, .subject a:link, .subject a:visited {color:#db5c83; font-weight:normal;}
.subject a:hover {color:#db5c83; background:transparent;}
.entry {border:0; background:transparent; margin:0 10px; font-size: 13px; font-family:verdana, sans-serif; color:#000;}
It's not absolutely perfect but it's pretty close. Any more questions please feel free to ask.
It's not, btw, a "formatting problem" per se...it's that the view-reply or reply-mode pages (same thing) use different markup than view-recent in your particular style. On top of that, the view-reply/reply mode pages don't have body class markup to allow you to target their different and/or missing classes directly. This is quite a common issue with LJ and DW styles. :)