Previous entries link

[mmeg]

Is there a way to add the "previous 5" (or 10 or whatever) link to the navigation bar at the top of my recent entries, reading and network pages? I'm using Mixit, which I believe is a Core1 LJ style.

ETA: Also I figured out how to reverse the order of the entries on my reading page (for values of figured out which equal bugging the Support people), but it didn't reverse the order of my Page Summary. I wonder if there's a way to do that. (I care about this much less than the first question.)

Comments

[matgb]

Because it's Core1, that means it's not supported, which means we have to figure it out from first principles.

Easiest way? Find the line of code that prints it at the bottom of the page, and copy it into the right bit at the top of the page.

Harder way, and not ideal, but doesn't involve hacking layers, is to move it with CSS, but that'd mean it was only at the top.

Basically, find it in the layer code, you're looking for the link with class="prevnext" in the code.

No idea on the latter, and doubt it'd be possible without going into the guts of thepage summary module. So beyond my ken, because I like it that way...

[mmeg]

Yeah, I figured the Page Summary thing was way more trouble than it's worth.

I'm pretty sure I found the code I need to move, but I still don't get where I need to move it. Can you point me in the right direction? My layer code is here.

[matgb]

You're not authorized to view this layer.

Needs to be made public, which I can never remember how to do, it's in the styles docs somewhere, LMK when it's done and I;'ll have a look in the morning if noone else has (it's 3am, insomnia doesn't always make me coherent even when I try helpful)

[mmeg]

I think I did it. For future reference, you add: layerinfo "source_viewable" = 1;

Thanks for helping out! I never mucked around with any of this stuff at LJ, but I just can't find a native DW layout that does what I want it to so I'm kind of flailing blindly.

[matgb]

Um...

Mixit is the same source as Expressive. Which is what I had on LJ. Expressive is significantly less flexible than Tabula Rasa, which is the basic DW style I now use.

I will, however, look at the code tomorrow for you, but if you can't do something in TR that you can do with Mixit, that's a bug that we need to fix.

[mmeg]

We are talking at cross-purposes here, as I believe you have mistaken me for someone who can write CSS (or who knows what CSS is for that matter). I can't do anything in Mixit because I can't do anything in any layout without a wizard or a tutorial. This layout came pre-hacked for DW.

Tabula Rasa is too flexible for me, in that it requires knowledge of CSS to make anything usable. And at some point whoever was developing DW styles decided that putting the poster's name somewhere other than directly beneath their icon was a reasonable thing to do on a reading page, so nearly everyone who is making styles has stuck with that. (Drifting is the exception, but I don't particularly care for it.)

I'm lurking the style comms since I am sure sooner or later someone will make a DW style that I can handle, and then I will switch to a supported layout. But in the meantime someone else did the Mixit hack, and I've got it exactly the way I like it except for this one issue.

In other words, the bug is that I am both dumb and picky.

[matgb]

OK, I think, but can't test. In the function
function Page::lay_print_header_links()

There's a line at the end that says
print """<li$class><a href="$url" title="$text">$text</a></li>""";

After this, but before the } on the next line, copy in the following:
var string skiplinks = ""; var Link forward = $.entry->get_link("nav_next"); var Link backward = $.entry->get_link("nav_prev"); if (defined $forward or defined $backward) { $skiplinks = """<li class="prevnext">"""; if (defined $backward) { $skiplinks = $skiplinks + """<a href="$backward.url">$*text_entry_prev</a>"""; } if (defined $backward and defined $forward) { $skiplinks = $skiplinks + " | "; } if (defined $forward) { $skiplinks = $skiplinks + """<a href="$forward.url">$*text_entry_next</a>"""; } $skiplinks = $skiplinks + """</li>"""; println safe $skiplinks;
I think that works. I'm not 100% sure and can't test it without creating a whole new style.

But, trying to be less cranky in this comment, Mixit is essentially the Vox layout redone for LJ. It's one of the best LJ layouts in terms of functionality, which is why the DW style devs used it as a basis for the core DW layout. Anything doable in Mixit is doable in a Core2 layout, the big advantage of that is you maintain all the built in accessibility goodness that they've spent ages building (ie friends using screenreaders, mobile browers, etc still get a good experience), and if there're new funtions created site wide that benefit everyone, you still get them.

Looking at your layout, I think you can make it Better in TR or similar, wihtout much tweaking. I definitely made a much better layout for DW than I had on LJ.

[mmeg]

I'm getting a compiling error:

Compile error: line 1847, column 10: Unexpected token found. Expecting: [TokenPunct] = (
Got: [TokenIdent] = Page
S2::Node, S2/Node.pm, 144
S2::NodeArguments, S2/NodeArguments.pm, 25
S2::NodeTerm, S2/NodeTerm.pm, 471
S2::NodeIncExpr, S2/NodeIncExpr.pm, 41
S2::NodeTypeCastOp, S2/NodeTypeCastOp.pm, 29
S2::NodeInstanceOf, S2/NodeInstanceOf.pm, 29
S2::NodeUnaryExpr, S2/NodeUnaryExpr.pm, 40
S2::NodeProduct, S2/NodeProduct.pm, 28
S2::NodeSum, S2/NodeSum.pm, 31
S2::NodeRelExpr, S2/NodeRelExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeEqExpr, S2/NodeEqExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeLogAndExpr, S2/NodeLogAndExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeLogOrExpr, S2/NodeLogOrExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeRange, S2/NodeRange.pm, 29
S2::NodeCondExpr, S2/NodeCondExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeAssignExpr, S2/NodeAssignExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeExpr, S2/NodeExpr.pm, 29
S2::NodeExprStmt, S2/NodeExprStmt.pm, 28
S2::NodeStmt, S2/NodeStmt.pm, 67
S2::NodeStmtBlock, S2/NodeStmtBlock.pm, 43
S2::NodeFunction, S2/NodeFunction.pm, 104
S2::Layer, S2/Layer.pm, 59
S2::Compiler, S2/Compiler.pm, 27

Context

1843:
1844: """;
1845: }
1846:
1847: function Page::print_stylesheets() {
1848: # These are the themes that need the header.css file included
1849: var bool{} header_themes = {
1850: "ocean-fish" => true,
1851: "ocean-squid" => true,

I appreciate the work the DW devs have put into accessibility and making things more awesome on the backend and I have spent hours combing style comms looking for something I can use. If you know someone who would like to volunteer to design a core2 layout to my specifications, please let me know. Otherwise, please accept my sincere promise that I will switch the moment I discover a core2 layout that I find both functional and attractive. (I did check to see if people were answering core1 questions in this comm before I posted. I'm sorry core1 kicked your puppy, and I will be happy to pick this back up in the morning when I have regained some emotional perspective.)

[mmeg]

Hey, sorry I got all hysterical. I appreciate the effort you're putting in. I just really want to shift to DW as my primary reading page, and I'm getting a little frustrated with the style options.

[adalger]

I took a look poking around in your layer this morning, and it may need more than just a quick edit. You have duplicates of things, and that may be causing the compiling issues you're having because of ... strange arcane behind-the-curtain hand-wavy stuff. To get this to work the way you want, someone may have to go clean up the code to the point where everything is only in there once.

You mentioned this came "pre-hacked." Can you point a finger at the source and maybe we can lean on the original hacker? :)

[mmeg]

grrliz made the original layout for LJ and posted a tutorial for importing it to DW here. She has been very clear that she won't troubleshoot, so if the original code is screwy, I'll just live with it as is. DW has been really good about adding new styles, so I'm sure eventually I'll find one I like and then I can bug you guys about that instead. (I got so spoiled using Smooth Sailing on LJ. The customization wizard on that one is so very very extensive that I've never had to deal with any of this.)